Pam O'Dell, who organized the Tea Party rally held on Tax Day in Gardiner, wrote a thoughtful letter to the New Paltz Times (4/29/10 edition) in which she objected to the paper's use of the term "teabaggers" in its coverage of the rally when referring to participants. Reporter Mike Townsend used the term or a variant of it
in the headline and twice in the story he wrote about the protest.
Townsend, in a response that is twice the length of O'Dell's letter, explains that people associated with the Tea Party movement have used "teabagger" to refer to themselves and so therefore he is justified in using a term that is slang for one person lowering his testicles into another person's mouth.
Townsend's sort of rationalization is on the order of referring to folks at an NAACP rally with the "n-word" because there were some young rappers on the scene talking about themselves like that. The analogy is not precise, but it's close enough to explain why a local newspaper doesn't let a reporter do what Townsend did. I blame the editor more than I do him, but he has to share responsibility.
The term was first used about Tea Party participants by the half-wit CNN anchor Anderson Cooper and was quickly picked up by other dimwits throughout the media. It spread very quickly and was absolutely used as a term of derogation. That some Tea Party participants turned it around and used it as a self-applied term, either to show that it did not bother them or because they were not hip enough to know the street use of "teabagger," hardly excused Cooper or his imitators and hardly excuses Townsend or his editor, or substantiates his weak rationalization.
Would Townsend like it if his own grandparents, for instance, were referred to with a term like that in their local newspaper?
If not, then he should rethink his rationalization. If he says yes, that he wouldn't care, then the New Paltz Times needs to find someone with a clear sense of professional responsibility to handle reporting assignments. I understand that I write only theoretically in that last sentence, because I know that the Times has insufficient standards to make that sort of judgement.